WORDS, an image-and-word poem

WORDS is a brilliant short (1:54) film that blends images to create a flowing "word poem" that is lovely, fun and thought-provoking.
It starts out with "play," which leads to "blow" and then "break" and "split" and then "run."

The images examine all aspects of the words. For instance, "run" is a person running, and then a runny nose, running a red light and running away... which leads to fly, and fly (zipper), and fly (work), and then fall... falling down, falling in love, waterfall, the Fall...

They used YouTube images to produce something really mesmerizing. Watch it with your kid, to bring new sense to some basic words and concepts and what they mean to us.


Re:WORDS from Everynone on Vimeo.


Thank you, Everynone, for this brilliant word poem. And BoingBoing for bringing it to our attention.

Scott Pilgrim trailer

Scott Pilgrim vs. The World - Official Trailer

This looks like a lot of fun, and I'm hoping it will be a good reading extension.

It's the movie, Scott Pilgrim vs. The World, starring (the adorable) Michael Cera. It's based on the very popular series of Scott Pilgrim books. Here's the official trailer which has just been released.




The movie was shot in Toronto, and lets the city be itself for once (Toronto usually doubles for a big US city). So that's kind of exciting.

Here's the website for the movie.
And the website for the Scott Pilgrim books.
And here's another book recommended by Michael Cera.
And here's a post on Boing Boing about the Scott Pilgrim movie.

Oh, and just for fun, here's that great Canadian please video that I do enjoy so much.

Alice movie too dark for (most) kids

As you know, I'm a big advocate of what I call reading extensions.

They're the added bonus events, movies, products and tie-ins that go beyond the book, and which may help some kids get interested in a book or explore a book more fully.

Alice in Wonderland
The other night, I saw Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland.

I enjoyed it. I thought it was a well thought-out interpretation of the book, with some nice visuals. (Why it had to be in 3D I'm not quite sure.)

But in my opinion it is not really a children's movie. I had high hopes for it, but I have to say that it's probably not a good reading extension for young children. Before you take your child to see this movie, I would urge you to either see it yourself, or check out some reviewers whose opinions you trust. (Here's Roger Ebert's review.)

Quick synopsis
Alice has previously visited Wonderland as a little girl. Now she has returned as a young woman to a very different Wonderland. The Red Queen has taken over, despoiled the landscape, and cast fear into the hearts of Wonderlanders. Everyone awaits "the Alice" who will slay the jabberwock and restore peace to Wonderland.

What's different about the movie and the book
Lewis Carroll's masterpiece (the book) relies heavily on the absurd. The Red Queen threatens to lop off everyone's head, but they all know that you just have to run away and she'll soon forget. In the movie, Burton's queen organizes a public beheading in the town square.

The lovely bits of nonsense, like having to repaint the white roses red, are glossed over and put into a flashback. No one's allowed to be very silly in this movie.

In the book, the Mad Hatter was mad as in loopy or wacky. In the movie, madness is flat-out insanity. As a result, we get a Hatter who is more Sylvia Plath than Daffy Duck.

That lovely character, the Dormouse, who walked such a fine line between pathos and silliness thanks to Carrroll's elegant depiction of him, has been Hollywoodized until he is flat and common.

The scary characters like the bandersnatch and the jabberwock, whose terrifyingness was only hinted at in the book, are made all too real in the movie. The jabberwock is given its own plot line. And don't get me started on "the vorpal sword." In the book vorpal is an adjective. In the movie, it's the sword's title, as if there is only one sword that could be vorpal.

There are a couple of pieces of nice new imagery, such as Alice becoming Joan of Arc as she battles the jabberwock. The caterpillar is given a more prominent and quite interesting role in the movie. And they haven't messed too much with the white rabbit, which is a good thing because he is a masterpiece as written.

But on the whole, while it may be an interesting movie, Alice in Wonderland 2010 is not for most children. It's rated PG and listed in the "kids and family" category, a misnomer that I think is almost as egregious as calling Slumdog Millionaire "uplifting," for which I will always despise those moviemakers.

Obviously, only you know your child and only you can judge what is or isn't suitable. But I think that most young children would be scared by the red queen's furious rants, the threat of the deadly jabberwock and the overall darkness of this typical Tim Burton-like fare.

As a palate cleanser, may I present Carroll's original nonsense poem (which, incidentally I memorized as a young girl, which feat I would be happy to demonstrate to anyone who would ask, which hasn't actually happened yet but I await...):

JABBERWOCKY, by Lewis Carroll
'Twas brillig, and the slithy toves
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe;
All mimsy were the borogoves,
And the mome raths outgrabe.

"Beware the Jabberwock, my son!
The jaws that bite, the claws that catch!
Beware the Jubjub bird, and shun
The frumious Bandersnatch!"

He took his vorpal sword in hand:
Long time the manxome foe he sought—
So rested he by the Tumtum tree,
And stood awhile in thought.

And as in uffish thought he stood,
The Jabberwock, with eyes of flame,
Came whiffling through the tulgey wood,
And burbled as it came!

One, two! One, two! and through and through
The vorpal blade went snicker-snack!
He left it dead, and with its head
He went galumphing back.

"And hast thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy!
O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!"
He chortled in his joy.

'Twas brillig, and the slithy toves
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe;
All mimsy were the borogoves,
And the mome raths outgrabe.